IN THIS SECTION
Arrow Driefontein Gold Mine
Arrow Kloof Gold Mine
Arrow Beatrix Gold Mine
Arrow South Deep Gold Mine
Arrow Tarkwa Gold Mine
Arrow Damang Gold Mine
Arrow St Ives Gold Mine
Arrow Agnew Gold Mine
Arrow Cerro Corona Mine
Arrow Gold Fields Exploration
   
Click to HIDE this navigation
Click to SHOW this navigation

Cerro Corona Mine

Technical Short Form Report

The Cerro Corona Mine in the Gold Fields Limited South America Region, is located 40 km north of the Yanacocha mine, and 80 km by road north of the departmental capital of Cajamarca in northern Peru. The deposit is hosted by a sub-vertical, cylindrical shaped diorite porphyry (600 – 700 m in diameter), emplaced in mid-Cretaceous limestone, marls and siliclastic rocks.

This Technical Short Form Report provides brief information on the mining and operational performance achieved during the first 10 months of operations and also presents an updated Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve statement, as at 30 June 2009. Cerro Corona produces gold and copper by conventional open pit mining methods and beneficiation of sulphide ores by the extraction of a copper-gold flotation concentrate, which is trucked approximately 380 km to the Peruvian Port of Salaverry for shipment to smelters in Asia and Europe

The Mine is expected to produce approximately 2.1 Moz of gold and 407 kt of copper in concentrate over a 15 year Life of Mine. At the declared commodity prices, the estimated copper and gold production is equal to a total of 4.5 million ounces gold equivalents (Moz Au Eq). The Metallurgical Process Plant has a treatment capacity of 18,000 tons of ore per day, or approximately 6.2 million tons of ore per year. LoM average total cash cost (exclusive of capital costs and taxes) is projected at US$358/oz AuEq.

All Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve figures reported are managed unless otherwise stated and Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves.

Salient Features

  • Ore processing started in August 2008 and full production was reached in December 2008.
  • A total of 105 koz of gold and 23,947 t of copper were produced in the first 10 months of operation.
  • Mineral Resource at 8.1 Moz (gold equivalent).
  • Mineral Reserve at 5.5 Moz (gold equivalent).
  • The current Life of Mine extends to 2024 (15 years).
  • Anchor point for growth in the Region.

Gold Fields Limited signed a definitive agreement in December 2003 to purchase an 80.7% economic and 92% voting interest in the Cerro Corona Project from Sociedad Minera Corona S.A., or SMC, a Peruvian family-owned company. The agreement called for a corporate reorganisation whereby the assets of the Cerro Corona Project were transferred to a Peruvian company called Gold Fields La Cima S.A. (formerly known as Sociedad Minera La Cima S.A.) in July 2004.

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the project was submitted to the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines, or MEM, in May 2005. The EIA was approved following a process of public consultation and comment, on 2 December 2005. Gold Fields Limited subsequently completed the purchase of a 92% voting interest (80.7% economic interest) in the Cerro Corona Project in January 2006.


View enlarged graphic [file size - 653kb]

View enlarged graphic [file size - 653kb]

Key Features

  Independent Audit   Figures reported in this declaration are as reviewed and approved by external consultants as at 30 June 2009
  Prepared by   Gold Fields Limited
  Effective date   30 June 2009
  Source of Information   This Technical Statement is a summary of the detailed internally sourced document entitled F2010 Cerro Corona Competent Persons Report
  Personal Inspection   Personal inspection is conducted by the Competent Persons as listed, who are full time employees of Gold Fields Limited
  General Location   The Cerro Corona deposit, centred at longitude 78° 37’ 8” W and latitude 6° 45’ 36” S, is located 1.5 km west-northwest of the village of Hualgayoc, some 80 km by road north of the departmental capital of Cajamarca, a city of more than 100,000 people and approximately 600 km north-northwest of Lima the capital of Peru
  Licence Status and Holdings   The mining rights owned by Cerro Corona cover an area of 2,940 ha. The surface rights related to the Cerro Corona Project is 945 ha. Cerro Corona is owned by Gold Fields La Cima S.A. (GFLC)
  Operational Infrastructure   Cerro Corona Mine operates one open pit operation and one copper gold flotation plant at elevations ranging from approximately 3,600 to 4,000 m above mean sea level
  Climate   No extreme climatic conditions are experienced that may affect mining operations
  Deposit Type   The Cerro Corona copper-gold deposit is typical of porphyry style mineralization comprising stockwork quartzpyrite- marcasite-chalcopyrite ± bornite ± hematite ± magnetite veining hosted by intensely altered intrusive lithologies of diorite to dacitic composition
  Life of Mine (LoM)   It is estimated that the current Mineral Reserve will be depleted in 2024
  Environmental   Cerro Corona’s environmental objective is to achieve the ISO 14001 certification during this calendar year. The final certification audit is planned for October 2009
  Regulatory Codes   Gold Fields Limited reports its Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves in accordance with the South African Code for The Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2007 SAMREC Code). The Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are underpinned by sufficient Mineral Resource Management process and protocol to ensure adequate corporate governance in respect of the intent of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In June 2009 the Lima Stock Exchange (www.bvl.com.pe) registered Gold Fields La Cima S.A. in the Good Corporate Governance Index (IBGC). This index, which is adjudicated on a yearly basis, includes the top nine listed companies in Peru, that exhibit the best practices in transparency, social responsibility, equity, trust and information integrity for their shareholders and stakeholders

Gold Fields has stated that: “If we cannot mine safely, we will not mine”. This principle is embedded at Cerro Corona.

Operating Statistics

  Year ended June     F2009   F2008  
  Waste Mined ‘000 tons   4,894   5,762  
  Sulphide Tons mined ‘000 tons   5,044   939  
  Strip Ratio w:o   1.0   6.1  
  Au Head Grade g/t   1.2   1.2  
  Cu Head Grade %   0.8   0.4  
  Tons Milled ‘000 tons   4,547    
  Au Head Grade g/t   1.24   -  
  Cu Head Grade %   0.80   -  
  Concentrate Produced tons   118,848   -  
  Gold Produced koz   105   -  
  Copper Produced tons   23,947   -  
  Total Gold Equivalent Produced eq koz   219   -  
  Total Gold Equivalent Sold eq koz   218   -  
  Operating Cost US$/oz   394   -  
  Capital Expenditure US$/oz   532      
  NCE US$/oz   926   -  
  Total Cash Cost million US$   80.3   -  
  Total Cash Cost US$/oz   369   -  
  Number of Employees personnel   310   277  
  Expected LoM years   15   16  
  Reserves million tons   89.3   94.1  
  Au Head Grade of Mineral Reserves g/t   1,0   1.0  
  Cu Head Grade of Mineral Reserves %   0.50   0.51  

Rounding off of figures presented in this report may result in minor computational discrepancies, where this occurs it is not deemed significant.

Geological Setting and Mineralisation

The Cerro Corona Project is located in northern Peru on the eastern slope of the western mountain range of the Andes. The copper-gold deposit is a typical porphyrystyle of mineralisation situated within the Hualgayoc Mining District in the northern part of the Cajamarca Province, a metallogenic province hosting prolific epithermal, porphyry and polymetallic style mineralisation. The mining area is characterised by moderate to moderately steep mountainous terrain with elevations ranging from approximately 3,600 to 4,000 m above mean sea level.

The Cerro Corona copper-gold porphyry is one of fourteen known Tertiary-aged porphyry Cu- Au-Mo deposits and nineteen epithermal Au-Ag deposits located in the Cajamarca Metallogenic Province (CMP) of northern Peru. There are two well mineralised districts within the CMP. These are the Yanacocha district in the south of the province, which is host to the largest producing gold mine in South America, and the Hualgayoc Mining District in the north which is one of the oldest mining districts in Peru, best known for its past silver production and more recent base metal production. This well known district has been an important silver producing area since Inca times, with more than 50 million ounces of silver and significant amounts of lead, zinc and copper produced from vein and manto-type deposits since the Spanish Conquest in the 16th Century. The Hualgayoc mining town was established in 1771.

The regional structure is characterised by large open folds of Cretaceous-aged sedimentary units, predominately limestones, with axial planes striking approximately 315° and steep southwest dips. Faulting is generally restricted to normal and oblique slip faults with offsets of a few metres to a few tens of metres.

Local geology

The Cerro Corona copper-gold deposit is hosted by a 600 to 700 m diameter subvertical cylindrical-shaped diorite porphyry emplaced in mid-Cretaceous limestone, marls and siliclastic rocks. Within the porphyry, the copper-gold mineralisation is primarily associated with zones of stockwork quartz veining conforming to classic porphyry-type vein definition. The Cerro Corona porphyry is unusual in that it carries a very high gold content in comparison to other copper-gold deposits.

There are at least two phases of diorite placement, only one of which is mineralised. The non-mineralised diorite is generally regarded as the last event, and is referred to as ‘barren core’. Most recent geological modelling strongly suggests that the Cerro Corona porphyry is probably comprised of four or five satellite stocks with the last two being barren. Early mineralisation was accompanied by moderate to strong potassic alteration which has been commonly overprinted by late, semi-pervasive argillic alteration and locally, by structurally controlled phyllic alteration assemblages (quartz-sericite-pyrite).

Regional Geology of the Cerro Corona area
Regional Geology of the Cerro Corona area

The intrusive has been emplaced at the intersection of Andean-parallel and Andeannormal (transandean) structures, which is a typical feature of the Cajamarca Metallogenic Province. A dominant northeast-southwest trending fault system running through the intrusive is referred to as the Mariela Fault trend and has an important relationship with the distribution of mineralisation. There are three distinct mineralised zones within the deposit. These are identified as the Annulus Zone, the Northern Zone and the Southern Zone. Each of these is treated separately in geological and resource modelling. In addition to the mineralised zones, the deposit is characterised by several domains conforming to the degree of oxidation and weathering. Supergene oxidation and leaching processes at Cerro Corona have led to the development of a weak to moderate copper enrichment blanket, allowing for the subdivision of the deposit, from the surface downward, into an oxide zone, a mixed oxide-sulphide zone, a secondary enriched (supergene) sulphide zone and a primary (hypogene) sulphide zone.

Sheeted and stockwork quartz-pyrite-marcasite-chalcopyrite ± bornite ± hematite ± magnetite veining   Blasthole drilling
Sheeted and stockwork quartz-pyrite-marcasite-chalcopyrite ± bornite ± hematite ± magnetite veining   Blasthole drilling
     
3D structural model of principal faults in the Cerro Corona deposit   3D structural model of principal faults in the Cerro Corona deposit
3D structural model of principal faults in the Cerro Corona deposit    

Geological domains

Oxidation,weathering,leaching and subsequent secondary enrichment has led to the formation of four mineral domains with distinctly different metallurgical behaviour. The top-most domain, the Oxide Domain, is characterised by the complete removal of copper mineralisation through the action of oxidation and leaching. Gold mineralisation within the Oxide Domain is characterised by some improvement in grade and is free milling due to the complete breakdown of primary sulphide minerals. All of the ore beneath the Oxide Domain comprises parts of the sulphide zone, which is separated into three domains on the basis of degree of oxidation and consequent change in sulphide mineralogical composition. The sulphide zone has three main domains, which from top to bottom are the Mixed Domain, the Supergene Domain and the Hypogene Domain. The Hypogene Domain is the primary sulphide zone. The Supergene Domain is an enriched copper blanket comprising chalcocitecovellite- chalcopyrite with grades in the range of 1% Cu.

Exploration and drilling

Exploration in the district continues on the 50:50 joint venture project with Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

Tailings drilling activities

Location of mineral zones within 2009 design pit
Location of mineral zones within 2009 design pit

Location of mineral zones within 2009 design pit
North south section through the Cerro Corona intrusion, showing interpreted geological and resource domains

Mining

The Cerro Corona deposit is mined by conventional surface mining methods. The final surface mine area is expected to cover some 900 x 500 m. The mining operation is extending from the crest of the original Cerro Corona hill, which peaked at 3,964 mRL, to a final depth at around 3,660 mRL.

Bulk mining will utilise 10 m benches with loading planned by a combination of a diesel hydraulic face shovel (230 t) and a rubber tired front end loader (190 t) loading and six (150 t) dump trucks. At this stage it is assumed that all of the material requires drilling and blasting (with varying powder factors) utilising 200 mm holes for 10 m benches.

Mine planning and scheduling

Cerro Corona’s LoM plan is based on detailed Geological and Mineral Resource models. The LoM plan is established from detailed short term and long term mining design and schedules using specialised Xpac© software and a resource estimation model termed the Bivariate Local Uniform Conditioning model (BLUC) that has been developed by internal Gold Fields Limited geostatistical consultants.

Geotechnical and geochemical models for waste materials have also been developed and are used in the LoM as an effective Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) management strategy. The planning cycle commences with the ratification of key input parameters prior to producing a compliant Mineral Resource statement. The planning process starts after the construction of the resource model and incorporates the following considerations:

  • Corporate decision on macro-economic parameters;
  • Development of a broad planning strategy, identifying key mining and processing constraints;
  • Development of comprehensive operating costs for mining, processing, administration and selling;
  • Modelling of the strategic, geological, geotechnical, metallurgical, environmental and economic parameters; for application of the Lerchs Grossman algorithm. Subsequently, development of a broad economic sequence and an optimum ultimate economic pit shell;
  • Development of a pit design and push backs applying mine design parameters; and
  • The resource model contained within the pit design is scheduled with consideration of impacting factors such as the following:
    – Economic evaluation of each measured or indicated block considered for processing;
    – Optimum practical economic sequence as generally defined by the push backs;
    – Structural material required for earth structures; and
    – Constraints related to the deposition of tailings and overburden material.

Open pit optimisations are built using Whittle 4X© – (Multi-element standard mine design software) on the BLUC resource model. Multiple case scenarios are run using varying gold and copper prices, processing costs, mill recovery values, and inclusion/exclusion of inferred material to ensure that the optimal pit is selected. The work undertaken includes:

  • Geotechnical review and pit wall angle recommendation;
  • Cost review;
  • Pit optimisation; and
  • Sensitivity analysis
View of the Cerro Corona pit from Cerro Candela   View of the rhyolite quarry for TSF construction material
View of the Cerro Corona pit from Cerro Candela   View of the rhyolite quarry for TSF construction material

Projects

The Cerro Corona Pit is considered to be the LoM project. The upside potential is controlled by the availability to place and store tailings. Efforts to find additional storage capacity are ongoing.

Mineral Processing

Commissioning and ramp-up of the processing plant was performed in parallel, to optimise the operational timing between these two activities. The ramp-up to full monthly production levels was achieved by December 2008.

From January 2009, the plant has been operating at near stable conditions with the only influence on the optimal performance resulting from the high variability of the ore feed. This variability is attributed to the complexities arising from the varying degree of sulphide oxidation in the different mineral domains such as the Mixed Ore and the Supergene Ore.

The various ore types from the mine are stockpiled on the Run of Mine pad. They are fed in appropriate blends by front end loader to the crushing plant. This comprises two mineral sizers in parallel, one of which is a standby unit. Mineral sizers facilitate crushing of soft, wet ore with clay components. The crusher feed design also makes provision for direct tipping of ore from the mine if necessary.

Crushed product is conveyed to a two-stage grinding circuit consisting of a SAG mill and a ball mill in closed circuit with cyclones for classification. Cyclone overflow represents the final milled product which feeds the flotation plant consisting of two sections. The rougher-scavenger flotation produces a bulk concentrate, which is then reground and upgraded to smelter copper grade in the four-stage cleaner flotation section.

The final concentrate is thickened and filtered before being stockpiled for final shipment to the smelters. The thickened rougher-scavenger flotation tails and the tails from the cleaner flotation are pumped to the tailings storage facility.

Training of qualified plant operators has been successfully achieved at Cerro Corona. Sixty people from the DIA (Direct Influence Area) were selected for a comprehensive seven-month training program comprising theory/ practical training, and exposure to existing Peruvian copper operations.

Sustainable Development

Cerro Corona commenced implementing it’s Health and Safety Management System in July 2008 in accordance with OHSAS 18001 and Corporate requirements. The objective of the Health and Safety Management System is to prevent injuries, occupational illness, and property damage and process loss.

View of the Cerro Corona process plant   View of the SAG and Ball Mills in the process plant
View of the Cerro Corona process plant   View of the SAG and Ball Mills in the process plant
View of the Aguilas TSF construction site    
View of the Aguilas TSF construction site    

No fatalities were recorded in F2009. Only two Lost Time Injuries (LTI) were recorded during the year and 2.3 million Man Work Hours without any LTI’s were accumulated. The Lost Day Injury Frequency Rate (LDIFR) improved from 0.96 in F2008 to 0.25. Cerro Corona was awarded the Safety Mining Award (second place) for Peru, a competition that is organized by the Safety Mining Institute of Peru.

Cerro Corona’s environmental objective is to achieve the ISO 14001 certification during this calendar year. The final certification audit is planned for October 2009.

Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

Mineral Resources are reported as in-situ and are inclusive of those Mineral Resources which have been modified to produce Mineral Reserves. The Measured, Indicated and Inferred Oxide and Sulphide Mineral Resource estimate has been calculated within the diorite intrusion above 3,300 mRL. Mineral Resource statements include Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources.

The Mineral Resources are reported from the Bivariate Localised Uniform Conditioned model at a Net Smelter Return (NSR) cut-off of US$10.92/t and constrained within an optimised Whittle Pit Shell, based on the same economic parameters as the NSR calculation. (For comparative purposes, the NSR cut-off applied to the current Mineral Resources is 30% higher than was declared in the June 2008 CPR at US$8.40/t).

Gold equivalent ounces are defined as a quantity of metal (such as copper) converted to an amount of gold in ounces, based on accepted gold and other metal prices i.e. The accepted total value of the metal based on its weight and value thereof divided by the accepted value of one troy ounce of gold.

Mineral Resources

  Mineral Resource Classification (Gold) Tons (Mt)   Grade (g/t)   Gold (‘000 oz)  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Open Pit                                    
  Measured 27.5   31.9   44.6   1.0   1.0   0.9   894   1,051   1,224  
  Indicated 116.7   137.8   170.2   0.8   0.8   0.7   2,940   3,336   3,632  
  Inferred 4.9   10.5   15.8   0.5   0.5   0.4   81   155   182  
  Total Open Pit 149.1   180.2   230.7   0.8   0.8   0.7   3,915   4,542   5,038  
  Surface stockpiles                                    
  Measured 6.7   2.8   0.0   1.4   1.5   0.0   295   135   0  
  Total surface 6.7   2.8   0.0   1.4   1.5   0.0   295   135   0  
  Grand Total 155.8*   183.0   230.7   0.8   0.8   0.7   4,209   4,677   5,038  

  Mineral Resource Classification (Copper) Tons (Mt)   Grade (g/t)   Copper Mlb  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Open Pit                                    
  Measured 26.7   29.0   39.6   0.5   0.5   0.5   305   345   415  
  Indicated 115.6   135.1   165.7   0.4   0.4   0.4   1,076   1,215   1,370  
  Inferred 4.8   10.4   15.8   0.3   0.3   0.2   35   69   84  
  Total Open Pit 147.0   174.5   221.1   0.4   0.4   0.4   1,416   1,629   1,869  
  Surface stockpiles                                    
  Measured 1.2   0.6   0.0   0.5   0.6   0   14   8   0  
  Total surface 1.2   0.6   0.0   0.5   0.6   0   14   8   0  
  Grand Total 148.2*   175.2   221.1   0.4   0.4   0.4   1,429   1,637   1,869  

  Mineral Resource Gold Equivalent Tons (Mt)   Grade (kg/t)   Gold Equivalents ('000 oz)  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Copper as Gold Equivalent (Cu-Au Eq)             3, 931   4,297   5,030  
  Grand Total Gold Equivalent (Au+Cu-Au Eq)             8,140   8,974   10,068  

* Oxide Mineral Resource contains gold only resulting in the difference in tonnage

Modifying factors

  • Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are quoted at an appropriate in-situ economic NSR cut-off with costs and tonnages and grades based on the resource block model. They also include estimates of any material below the NSR cut-off required to be mined to extract the complete pay portion of the Resource;
  • All Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are quoted as at 30 June 2009;
  • Unless otherwise stated, all Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are quoted as 100% and are not attributable with respect to ownership;
  • All Mineral Reserves are quoted in terms of Run-of-Mine (ROM) grades and tonnages as delivered to the metallurgical processing facilities;
  • Mineral Reserve statements include only Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources, modified to produce Mineral Reserves and contained in the LoM plan; and
  • Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves undergo both internal and external audits during the year and any issues identified are rectified at the earliest opportunity – usually during the current reporting cycle.
  Modifying Factors      
  Resource Gold Price US$/ oz 1,000  
  Resource Copper Price* US$/lb 2.20  
  Reserve Gold Price US$/ oz 800  
  Reserve Copper Price* US$/lb 1.75  
  Resource Cut off grade NSR (US$) 10.92  
  Reserve Cut off grade NSR (US$) 10.92  
  Stripping ratio Waste: ore 0.81  
  Dilution % -  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Au) – Mixed % 55  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Cu) – Mixed % 58  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Au) – Supergene % 72  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Cu) – Supergene % 84  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Au) – Hypogene % 75  
  Plant Recovery Factor (Cu) – Hypogene % 89  

* Whittle shells run at US$2.20/lb for Mineral Resources and US$1.75/lb for Mineral Reserves. However US$2.75/lb and US$2.2/lb were used to calculate equivalent gold ounces for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves and to compare cash flows.

Grade tonnage curves

Sulphide Mineral Resource

Sulphide Mineral Resource

Oxide Mineral Resource

Oxide Mineral Resource

Mineral Reserves

  Mineral Reserves Classification (Gold) Tons (Mt)   Grade (g/t)   Gold (‘000 oz)  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Open Pit                                    
  Proved 21.5   23.6   27.7   1.1   1.1   1.1   756   843   1,016  
  Probable 66.6   69.9   70.2   0.9   1.0   1.0   2,017   2,145   2,160  
  Total Open Pit 88.1   93.5   98.0   1.0   1.0   1.1   2,773   2,988   3,176  
  Surface stockpiles                                    
  Proved 1.2   0.6   0.0   1.2   1.4   0   49   29   0  
  Total surface stockpiles 1.2   0.6   0.0   1.2   1.4   0   49   29   0  
  Grand Total 89.3   94.1   98.0   1.0   1.0   1.0   2,822   3,017   3,176  

  Mineral Reserves Classification (Copper) Tons (Mt)   Grade (%)   Copper Mlb  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Open Pit                                    
  Proved 21.5   23.6   25.8   0.6   0.6   0.6   266   305   353  
  Probable 66.6   69.9   68.2   0.5   0.5   0.5   708   748   736  
  Total Open Pit 88.1   93.5   94.0   0.5   0.5   0.5   974   1,053   1,089  
  Surface stockpiles                                    
  Proved 1.2   0.6   0   0.5   0.6   0   14   8   0  
  Total surface stockpiles 1.2   0.6   0   0.5   0.6   0   14   8   0  
  Grand Total 89.3   94.1   94.0   0.5   0.5   0.5   988   1,061   1,089  

  Mineral Reserve Gold Equivalent Tons (Mt)   Grade (kg/t)   Gold Equivalents ('000 oz)  
June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006   June 2009   June 2008   Dec 2006  
  Copper as Gold Equivalent (Cu-Au Eq)             2,717   2,857   2,720  
  Grand Total Gold Equivalent (Au+Cu-Au Eq)             5,539   5,874   5,896  

View of the Gordas TSF from Cerro Candela
View of the Gordas TSF from Cerro Candela

Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Reconciliation year-on-year

Mineral Resource

Factors that affected Mineral Resource reconciliation:

  • Decreases resulting from depletion, a rise in the NSR cut-off and geotechnical factors.

Change in Gold Mineral Resource F2009 to F2010

Change in Gold Mineral Resource F2009 to F2010

Change in Copper Mineral Resource F2009 to F2010

Change in Copper Mineral Resource F2009 to F2010

 

Mineral Reserve

Factors that affected Mineral Reserve reconciliation:

  • Decrease resulting from depletion.

Change in Gold Mineral Reserve F2009 to F2010

Change in Gold Mineral Reserve F2009 to F2010

Change in Copper Mineral Reserve F2009 to F2010

Change in Copper Mineral Reserve F2009 to F2010

 

Mineral Reserve sensitivity

Improved Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves potential are influenced by increased commodity prices, but is limited by the size of the Tailings Storage Facility (94.1 Mt). The sensitivities are not based on detailed depletion schedules and should be considered on a relative and indicative basis only.

Managed Mineral Reserve Sensitivity

Note: Cerro Corona is currently Tonnage constrained due to the current capacity of it`s tailings facility. Adoption of possible TSF expansion opportunities will provide the mine with future upside potential.
Note: Cerro Corona is currently Tonnage constrained due to the current capacity of it`s tailings facility. Adoption of possible TSF expansion opportunities will provide the mine with future upside potential.

 

Regulatory Codes

SAMREC
This Technical Statement has been prepared in Compliance with the South Africa Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2007 SAMREC Code).

JSE
This Technical Statement has been prepared in compliance with the listing requirements of the JSE Securities Exchange, South Africa (JSE), specifically Section 12 – Issue 11.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve is underpinned by an adequate Mineral Resource Management process and protocol to ensure adequate corporate governance in respect of the intent of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Environmental
Cerro Corona has an environmental management team who are supported by specialist assistance from corporate office in Johannesburg. The systems, procedures, training etc. are at international best practice levels. Gold Fields Limited has produced a Sustainability Report in 2009 and intends reporting annually in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative.

Competent Persons

Julian Misiewicz: Consulting Geologist
BSc (Hons) Geology, MSc Geology. Mr Misiewicz is a Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists (SEG 541613). He has 31 years experience in the mineral exploration and mining industry and is responsible for the overall correctness, standard and compliance of this declaration.

Alberto Cardenas: Mining Operations Manager
Civil Engineer (CIP 62693), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Mr Cardenas has 15 years experience in the mining industry, and has held senior positions in construction and mining. He is responsible for the management of the Mining and Geology Department and related functions.

Eddie Garcia: Chief Mining Engineer
Mine Engineer (CIP 109603), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Mr Garcia has 12 years experience in mining engineering and 3 years in Business Planning at Minera Yanacocha. Mr Garcia is responsible for the Mineral Resource Management at Cerro Corona.

Hugo Solis: Long Term Engineer
Mining Engineer (CIP 77973), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Mr. Solis has 14 years experience in surface and underground mining operations

Oscar Retto
Resource Manager, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, specialized in Geostatistics at the Paris School of Mines. Mr Retto has over 15 years working in exploration and mining companies as a resource modeller and geostatistician in Canada, Australia and Peru. Currently, is responsible for the Geology Department at Cerro Corona mine

Key Technical Staff

  Post Incumbent Qualifications Years   Key Responsibilities  
  Head of Operations Manuel Diaz Metallurgical Engineer 25   Responsible for the overall strategic direction, leadership & management  
  Mining:
Senior Manager: Mine
Alberto Cardenas Civil Engineer, MBA 15   Mine Operations, Engineering. Geotechnical and Mine Geology management  
  Mineral Resources:
Manager: chief engineer
And resource management
Eddie Garcia Mining Engineer, MBA 15   Mine Planning, Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and the compilation of CPR  
  Regional Chief Financial Officer Rodolfo Michels BS in Business Administration Certified Professional Accountant
Reg. Chartered Accountant
38   Financial management, reporting and compliance  
  Human Resources: Senior Manager: Human Resources Jaime Obreros Attorney in Law 29   Human resources, Training & development  
  Metallurgy: Senior Manager: Process Ruben Zevallos Metallurgical Engineer 26   Mineral Processing and Metallurgy  
  Engineering: Senior
Manager:Engineering and Construction
Carlos Herrera Electrical & Mechanical Engineering, MBA 29   Engineering, logistics and infrastructure management  
  Environmental Manager Luis Alberto Sanchez MSc Environmental Services
Mechanical Engineer
27   Environmental management  

Cerro Corona History at a Glance

View enlarged graphic

Driefontein History at a Glance

View enlarged graphic