|
|
| SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Supporting our overall Sustainable Development
policy and framework, we have developed an
environmental policy framework. Supporting
the environmental policy, we are developing
practice guides that serve as internal guidance
for the operations. These practice guides serve
to include guidance on:
- Environmental management systems;
- Environmentalcontract inclusions;
- Climatechange;
- Biodiversity;
- Environmental economics; and
- Mineclosure.
Being an ISO14001certifiedcompany, the
management systems practice guide mirrors
the requirements of the ISO14001 standard
andcontains the requirement for operations
to maintain suchcertification. In the case of
new operations, the practice guide provides
guidance on how to achieve certification.
In line with our material stewardship and supplychain management policy, we areconsolidating
the requirements forconformance by our
business partners and the environmental contract inclusions practice guide contributes
to this process.
During F2009 we started to develop acarbon
strategy for the Group. The intention is toconsolidate ourcurrent practices and to position
thecompany appropriately with regard to this
important issue. It is expected that this project
will becompleted early in the new financial
year and that the strategy will be integrated
into theclimatechange practice guide. Further
information regarding our response toclimatechange is provided under theclimatechange
and energy efficiency section of this report.
As the issue of biodiversity is an essential component of our environmental management
systems, we are consolidating our approach into a practice guide. We are fortunate to have considerable expertise in this regard and these
experts are actively involved in the development
of the document.
We are also piloting an environmental economics
system at a specific South African operation,
with the intention to develop a standardised
approach that can be replicated at the other
operations throughout the Group. It is intended
that this system will link into various systems
such as SAP. On completion of the pilot, an
environmental economics practice guide will be
developed.
On the closure front, we have a long-standing
Sarbanes Oxley compliant protocol for closure
provision. This protocol documents the
approach to closure, strategic principles toconsider, and how to determine the provisioning
quantum. The development of this practice
guide was relatively simple as we converted
our existing procedure into the practice guide
format.
All of the above practice guide documents went
through an internal review process to ensure
that they are appropriate to all operations.
This approach also allows us to gain leverage
from the substantial expertise in the Group and
facilitates a process of knowledge sharing andcross pollination.
Environmental management systems
All of our operations have implemented formal
environmental management systems that are
ISO14001:2004 (Environmental Management
Systems)certified. We are pleased to report
that South Deep achieved certification
during the year and that Cerro Corona has
embarked on the process ofcertification.
During the year, our certified operations have
all undergone numerous audits as required by
their certifications and we are pleased that all
operations have retained their certifications.
Our environmental management systems for
exploration activities are also ISO14001certified
and certifications for these activities have also
been retained.
The exploration offices have also deployed
formalised environmental management systems
and are ISO14001certified.
Environmental data
The primary function of Gold Fields Environmental
Management System is to generate data for
internal management purposes, principal
among which are continual improvement,
prevention of pollution, achievement of targets
set by management, and the maintenance of legal compliance. The data presented in the
tables below provides a sample of the range
of information generated by this system and
has been selected for its materiality as well
as disclosure in terms of the Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI) indicators. All data is based on
direct measurement or calculations based on
empirical data using generally accepted best
practice methodologies. Instances where
previous years’ data have been restated
are highlighted in the table. None of these corrections are deemed to be material.
The data for the underground South African
operations will reflect different resource consumption when compared to the open-pit
operations in Ghana and Australia. In South
Africa, electricity provides the primary source
of power required for the transportation of ore
from the rock face to the processing plants; in
the opencast mines this is done with diesel-powered
trucks. Open-pit mines also do not
need timber for roof support, as do the South
African mines. They do, however, have a greater
need forcement, which is an input for the heap
leach operations. The other reagents used inside
the plant vary in accordance with ore mineralogy.
In F2008, we reported mainly on greenhouse gas
emissions (specifically directCO2consumption).
We are reviewing our data collection systems
and will resume reporting this data between
operations. Efforts to normalize the reporting
of all disclosed environmental data so as to
provide a better overall indication of progress
and comparison between operations is ongoing.
The tables that follow represent the Group’s
performance with regard to key consumables
(timber is not material within the international
operations and Cerro Corona is not included as
it is not operated for a full 12 months.
 |
| First tree planted by the General Manager of Tarkwa
Gold Mine on Environmental Day, 2009 |
Keyconsumables:
| |
Timber (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
34,549 |
|
40,864 |
|
43,942 |
|
43,204 |
|
45,100 |
|
| |
Kloof |
27,286 |
|
37,982 |
|
37,574 |
|
55,735 |
|
39,900 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
28,171 |
|
41,659 |
|
42,587 |
|
43,259 |
|
46,100 |
|
| |
South Deep |
254 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Blasting agents (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
3,127 |
|
1,993 |
|
1,400 |
|
1,042 |
|
1,400 |
|
| |
Kloof* |
731 |
|
2,196 |
|
1,160 |
|
1,415 |
|
1,300 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
3,035 |
|
3,231 |
|
5,185 |
|
4,607 |
|
4,600 |
|
| |
South Deep |
86 |
|
n/d** |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
23,884 |
|
30,578 |
|
29,712 |
|
28,556 |
|
23,000 |
|
| |
Damang |
2,970 |
|
4,148 |
|
3,568 |
|
2,044 |
|
1,300 |
|
| |
St Ives |
7,390 |
|
6,258 |
|
4,256 |
|
4,928 |
|
4,000 |
|
| |
Agnew |
588 |
|
3,421 |
|
3,287 |
|
4,130 |
|
1,700 |
|
*Excludescontractor blasting agents **Not determined
| |
Hydrochloric acid HCL (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
1,054 |
|
1,238 |
|
710 |
|
1,967 |
|
2,690 |
|
| |
Kloof |
729 |
|
41 |
|
433 |
|
599 |
|
790 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
673 |
|
807 |
|
738 |
|
692 |
|
840 |
|
| |
South Deep |
93 |
|
171 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
1,048 |
|
1,481 |
|
1,267 |
|
1,444 |
|
1,100 |
|
| |
Damang |
270 |
|
198 |
|
173 |
|
232 |
|
200 |
|
| |
St Ives |
355 |
|
272 |
|
236 |
|
288 |
|
370 |
|
| |
Agnew |
197 |
|
176 |
|
192 |
|
140 |
|
150 |
|
| |
Lime (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
3,718 |
|
4,021 |
|
5,782 |
|
7,580 |
|
7,600 |
|
| |
Kloof |
2,928 |
|
4,301 |
|
3,589 |
|
4,916 |
|
9,100 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
2,831 |
|
2,951 |
|
3,422 |
|
3,033 |
|
3,900 |
|
| |
South Deep |
3,744 |
|
3,976 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
4,358 |
|
4,289 |
|
3,537 |
|
3,085 |
|
2,500 |
|
| |
Damang |
2,645 |
|
2,741 |
|
3,251 |
|
3,239 |
|
3,500 |
|
| |
St Ives |
15,860 |
|
12,894 |
|
11,820 |
|
9,786 |
|
18,300 |
|
| |
Agnew |
1,635 |
|
1,155 |
|
1,402 |
|
2,042 |
|
2,400 |
|
| |
Cement (tons)* |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
191 |
|
243 |
|
458 |
|
760 |
|
900 |
|
| |
Kloof |
683 |
|
39 |
|
44 |
|
101 |
|
105 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
166 |
|
823 |
|
587 |
|
762 |
|
1,100 |
|
| |
South Deep |
231 |
|
n/d** |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
37,147 |
|
60,577 |
|
67,905 |
|
64,507 |
|
72,100 |
|
| |
Damang |
0 |
|
0 |
|
5 |
|
23 |
|
13 |
|
| |
St Ives |
7,925 |
|
11,055 |
|
8,674 |
|
8,386 |
|
11,500 |
|
| |
Agnew |
9,354 |
|
4,525 |
|
2,255 |
|
2,051 |
|
2,400 |
|
*Reporting methodology has been amended **Not determined
| |
Caustic soda (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
452 |
|
282 |
|
359 |
|
592 |
|
650 |
|
| |
Kloof |
293 |
|
157 |
|
81 |
|
176 |
|
510 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
578 |
|
624 |
|
512 |
|
556 |
|
530 |
|
| |
South Deep |
294 |
|
337 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
809 |
|
869 |
|
749 |
|
619 |
|
300 |
|
| |
Damang |
393 |
|
354 |
|
336 |
|
347 |
|
330 |
|
| |
St Ives |
352 |
|
307 |
|
330 |
|
284 |
|
370 |
|
| |
Agnew |
486 |
|
350 |
|
274 |
|
297 |
|
280 |
|
Incidents
Wecontinue to report environmental incidents in accordance with our incident reporting system.
This system allows for the reporting of incidents from level 1 through 5 which is dictated by the
severity of the incident. These levels are defined as:
- Level 1 – incidents of minor non-conformance that result in no or negligible adverse environmental
impact;
- Level 2 – incidents that result in short-term, limited and non-ongoing adverse environmental
impacts;
- Level 3 – incidents that result in ongoing, but limited environmental impact;
- Level 4 – incidents that result in medium-term environmental impact; and
- Level 5 – incidents that result in long-term environmental impact.
In keeping with the principles of materiality, Gold Fields is reporting level two incidents and above.
Level 1 incidents are of a minor and administrative nature only.
The table below reflects the incidents for the reporting period:
|
Level |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
F2004 |
|
F2003 |
|
| 2 |
181 |
|
111 |
|
117 |
|
71 |
|
129 |
|
208 |
|
144 |
|
| 3 |
7 |
|
10 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
| 4 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
| 5 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Unfortunately there were seven level three incidents during the reporting period. The table below
provides detail on the nature of the incidents as well ascorrective actions taken. It should be noted
that there have been zerocyanide related incidents.
| Level 3 incidents |
|
Remedial action |
| High levels of sedimentation in the Mesa de
Plata sediment pond at Cerro Corona. |
|
The pond was cleaned out to ensure thecorrect
functioning of the facility.changes to the design
were implemented to ensure ongoing efficiency |
| About 600cubic metres of tailings were spilt
south of Letsatsing Village at Driefontein. |
|
Pipe was replaced and regular thickness tests
are conducted on all pipes in the mine. The site
wascleaned up. |
| About 800cubic metres of tailings spilt between
a mine workers’ hostel and redundant playing
grounds at Driefontein. |
|
Pipe was replaced and regular thickness tests
are conducted on all pipes in the mine. The site
wascleaned up. |
| 300cubic metres of tailings were spilt along
the road to the east of No.1 tailings dam at
Driefontein. |
|
Pipe was replaced and regular thickness tests
areconducted on all pipes in the mine. The site
wascleaned up. |
| Tailing spillage at No 4 tailings dam (6 station) at
Driefontein. |
|
Occurred due to pipe casing corrosion. The
pipe was replaced andcleaning operations are
underway. |
| Tailings spill at No 2 tailings dam pipe burst at
Driefontein. |
|
Occurred due to valve failure. The faulty valve
has been replaced. The tailings spill has been contained and cleaning operations are nearing completion. |
| Tailings spillage at No 2 tailings dam at
Driefontein. |
|
Occurred due to pipe corrosion. The pipe has
been replaced and cleaning operations are
nearing completion. |
At the South African operations, routine water
monitoring (including water sampling and
bio-monitoring, which are typically done in
structures like the bio-monitoring dams shown
in the picture overleaf) was performed at
strategic areas on different mines to determine water quality for both surface and underground
water throughout the year. Water sampling
results conducted to check levels of pollutants
in Gold Fields water circuits revealed a trend
similar to that of the previous year, which
was within the limits set in the current water permits. Similarly, bio-monitoring conducted to
identify any potential environmental impacts to
biological species due to mine water discharges
indicated that the surface water conditions were
able to support the desired level of biodiversity.
Of the four South African operations, only one
(Kloof) has been issued with a new water use
licence. Driefontein has received a draft water
use licence, while the Regulators have indicated
that South Deep’s draft licence is imminent.
Beatrix is in a unique situation in that it has
received correspondence from its regulatory
authority indicating that it was not necessary
to apply for a water use licence. Despite this,
a decision was made to proactively apply for a
water use licence.conditions on the licences
(i.e. both the final and the draft licences) are
more stringent than the previous water permits.consequently, all operations are changing
their systems to be in line with the new licence conditions, including those mines which are
still awaiting their water use licences. It is
worth mentioning that some conditions will
take time (about two years) to implement as
they necessitate physical changes in various
mine engineering controls. During the year,
Gold Fields developed and implemented acomprehensive new water strategy, utilising
the best available technologies and proven
best practices, to ensure that all water in all of
the applicable water circuits complies with the
national drinking water standards, and to ensure
that water leaving Gold Fields’ properties has no
adverse impact on people or the environment.
In terms of issues related to water quality in the
Wonderfonteinspruit (WFS), Gold Fields has continued, during the year, to engage proactively
with all stakeholders in thecommunity of the
WFS catchment Area, and played a leading role
in the numerous public bodies and processes
related to the WFS.
As previously reported, Gold Fields established
the Wonderfontien Action Group (WAG), which comprised inter alia, the gold mines in the
area, the regulators, academic institutions and
representatives of the community. The WAG
had three stated objectives, these being to:
- Sample the sediment in the WFS so as to
determine the spatial extent of any elevated
heavy metals;
- Pilot a water monitoring methodology that
would be open and transparent and available
on a “real time” basis to all stakeholders; and
- Help re-establish the Water Management
Forums in thecatchment area.
To date all three objectives have been met. The
approach to water monitoring was successful
and now needs to be rolled out in the catchment
area. Furthermore, in order to ensure the continuation of the processes initiated by
the WAG and to further increase the level of
objectivity, it was decided to incorporate the
function into the Water Management Forums
in the form of a Mining Interest Group (MIG).
This group, which currently includes other
mining companies in the area, is a subset of
the larger Forum and is functioning well and has
remained involved with the issues at hand. In a
parallel process of contributing towards finding
an acceptable and practicable solution for the
WFS, the Regulators have recently formed
the Steering Committee for Remediation of
Mining Related Radioactive contamination
(SCRMRRC) that will be looking at radioactive contamination of water in the whole of South
Africa. The Wonderfonteinspruit Catchment
Area Technical Working Group was formed
under the auspices of the SCRMRRC to look
specifically at the WFS Catchment area. This
technical working group is characterised by
representation from the mining industry as well
as the surrounding communities.
The issue of total dissolved solids (TDS)
exceeding licenceconditions at the tailings
storage facility at Agnew was disclosed in our
previous annual report. The focus with regard
to this issue has been to rehabilitate the tailings
storage facility as it is no longer in use. We have
also launched an extensive investigation to
better understand the source of the elevation
of the TDS.
At Cerro Corona, we have assigned costs
toclosure actions with regard to water
management. As part and parcel of our
operations, we continue to refine our
understanding of the mineralogy of the gold
bearing deposit. This is achieved through a
very comprehensive sampling and leach testing
programme that seeks to ensure that we deal
with sulphide bearing material appropriately and
that closure actions are designed accordingly.
The deposit doescontain material that has the
potential to be acid generating, which explains
the implementation of this comprehensive and
proactive programme. Overseeing this entire
process, we have procured the services of
internationally recognised experts to serve on a
review board that provides us with independent
insight and review of all of our actions with
regard to tailings material and waste rock.
At Tarkwa, grade control drilling has indicated
the presence of sulphuric material in one of our
pits. We have designed a sampling programme,
which integrates with our usual grade control
drilling and seeks to ensure that we understand
the extent of the sulphuric material and that the
necessary actions are put in place to handle the
material responsibly. Fortunately, the presence
of such material is uncharacteristic at our
Ghanaian operations.
 |
Bio-monitoring dams at Kloof, which is typical of Gold
Fields’ responsible water management programme |
| |
Total water withdrawn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from local sources (m3) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
17,370,067 |
|
14,720,540 |
|
16,416,000 |
|
17,450,000 |
|
18,200,000 |
|
| |
Kloof |
20,847,990 |
|
20,671,000 |
|
20,799,974 |
|
23,862,289 |
|
25,500,000 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
11,937,000 |
|
11,232,000 |
|
16,912,192 |
|
13,204,645 |
|
15,100,000 |
|
| |
South Deep1 |
4,477 |
|
5,027 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
4,527,850 |
|
7,941,690 |
|
5,596,000 |
|
2,539,527 |
|
5,200,000 |
|
| |
Damang |
476,742 |
|
547,910 |
|
594,376 |
|
673,439 |
|
800,000 |
|
| |
St Ives |
12,272,576 |
|
14,197,081 |
|
3,941,007 |
|
3,213,848 |
|
3,600,000 |
|
| |
Agnew |
242,705 |
|
246,700 |
|
192,612 |
|
2,128,000 |
|
2,100,000 |
|
1 Different reporting methodology used by previous owner, and therefore not reported in years prior to F2008.Cerro Corona not included as it has not operated for a full 12 month period.
Energy andclimate change
The implementation of the first phase of
the Beatrix methane extraction project was
temporarily suspended and a decision was
made to first establish market interest and then
to negotiate an offtake agreement prior to any
further expenditure. Tenders were requested
and a total of 22 offers received. Many of the
offers extended well beyond the 2012 closure
of the Kyoto Protocol and some extended to
2020. These tenders have been reviewed and
the top three tenders selected. Negotiations
to establish a draft termsheet werecompleted
during July 2009.
 |
| Solar power used at St Ives Gold Mine in Australia |
At Kloof, a project design document (PDD)
explaining the energy savings associated
with the implementation of hard ice cooling
replacing conventional cold water cooling
systems at 3 shaft was completed with acalculated potential energy saving equivalent
to an estimated 55,000certified Emission
Reduction (CER)credits. The validation of the
PDD is scheduled for early F2010. Two Project Initiation Notes (PIN) dealing with Voluntary
Emission Reduction (VER)credits were
prepared and submitted to TFS brokers in the
United Kingdom to test the market. Response
has been slow as the VER market has slowed
down significantly as a result of the economic
downturn. Additional projects identified include
Project Ethos, energy savings associated
with reduced waste rock hoisted and energy
recovery and electricity generation as part
of the Uranium Project associated with the
sulphur roasting part of the project. Exclusivity
agreements to further develop these potential
projects are under review.
The National Business Initiative’s (NBI)carbon
Disclosure Project aims to act as an intermediary
between large corporations and shareholders on
all climate change related issues and requires
us to update our submissions by end of May of
each year. Our May 2008 submission was well
received and we were ranked second in thecarbon intensive sector by the NBI.
As part of our carbon footprint determinations,
we have comparedcalendar years 2007 and
2008 on a like for like basis. This assessment
uncovered the fact that our energy savings
measures are bearing fruit with the total
emissions reducing by some 290,000 tons
year on year, which equates to a 4.5 percent
reduction.
Following the completion of the determination
of our carbon footprint this year, we procured
the services of an external service provider
with expertise on the issue of climate change to assist us in the development of acarbon strategy. This work has commenced
and will becompleted early in the new
financial year.
Beatrix Gold Mine has the highest methane
emission rate of any gold mine in South Africa.
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas of which the contribution to global warming and climate change
is 21 times higher than that of carbon dioxide. To
mitigate its global warming impact, a carbon credit
project under the clean Development Mechanism
(CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol has been registered
to capture and destroy the methane emissions
from the Beatrix mine.
The methane will be captured at source and
piped to surface along an extraction column.
During phase one of the project the methane will
be flared and, during a second phase, electricity
will be generated by using reciprocating gas
engines which will generate approximately
4MW of electrical power and which will be
made available for use by the mine.carbon credits will be earned for both the destruction of
the methane gas as well as for the production
of electricity.
This project has a number of benefits for the
mine, being the mitigation of the global warming
impact as well as the removal of approximately
49% of the total volume of methane gas from
the general body of the air, thus reducing the
methane related risk in the mine. There is furthermore a potential benefit in that the mine
will generate an income through the trading
of carbon credits whilst reducing its carbon
footprint by approximately 25%. It will also assist
in alleviating the energy shortage experienced
within South Africa. This is the first project of
its nature in the mining industry in South Africa.
At the international operations, we have
integrated all aspects ofclimatechange into
our strategic planning exercise as well as into
our Resources and Reserves Review that
takes place on an annual basis. Furthermore,
the issue of climate change is a fundamental consideration within our strategic management
system that we have implemented for
sustainable development.
For the Australasia Region, wecontinue to
submit the required information to the Australian
Greenhouse Office. We also submitted our initial
public and government reports in accordance
with the Energy Efficiency Opportunities Act.
The programme is targeted at organisations
using in excess of 0.5PJ of energy per annum
and works to encourage the implementation
of efficiency measures. Our December 2008
submission identified a total of 96 projects,
representing savings of some 96,000GJ or
8.8 percent of total energy usage. Specificallyconsidering F2009, between the St Ives and
Agnew mine sites, a total of 21 of these projects
were considered, with an overall implementation capitalcost of A$8.3 million and an annual
payback of A$1.8 million.
The progress on energy efficiency projects
has been greatly assisted by the appointment
of energy officers at both St Ives and Agnew,
which has lever aged off the existing continuous
improvement systems.
A large focus in Australia has been the release
of draft legislation for the carbon Pollution
Reduction Scheme (CPRS) in May 2009. This
legislation is now planned to commence 1 July
2011. ThecPRS is currently designed as acap and Trade scheme, whereby acarbon
permit will be required for each tonne ofCO2
equivalent emitted, with the price fixed in the
first year at $A10/tonneCO2, after which thecap is lifted to A$40/tonneCO2. Gold Fields
Australia has formed part of a gold industry collective,constituting approximately 80 percent of Australia’s gold production, which
submitted an application to the government to
be included as one of the industries to obtain
a proportion of freecarbon permits under the
scheme. Free carbon credits can be issued if
the industry complies with certain requirements
under the scheme.
The CPRS scheme will allow the import of certain carbon units. This allows us to look to
the global platform on which we operate for
opportunities.
Renewable energy options to supplement
gas fired power were also progressed for the
Australian operations, with a wind resource
survey to be commissioned on Lake Lefroy at
St Ives and solar power options covering the
TSF2 area progressed at Agnew. We intend to
make use of recently announced government
incentive programmes to assist progression of
these projects.
In Ghana, a South African basedcompany,
Powertech IST Otokon,completed energy
efficiency workshops and project evaluations
for the Tarkwa and Damang operations during
January 2009. The resultant report for the
Tarkwa minecontains a total of 23 projects, of
which 10 are viable based on initial estimates.
These projects account for predicted annual
savings of 32,500GJ. Final reports for the
Damang mine are expected in early F2010.
In addition to this, the option of using locally
produced biodiesel, mixed with standard diesel
and back-up power supply options for the
Tarkwa CIL plant, are being evaluated. Longer-term
gas fired power options, possibly through
a gold industryconsortium, will be explored
further in F2010.
Energy saving requirements and alternative
technologies are also included in thecurrent fuel
and lubricants tender process thatcovers both
the Australian and Ghanaian operations.
The following tables report the Group’s
performance with respect to energyconsumption.
 |
| Alien vegetation eradication
project at Kloof Gold Mine |
Energyconsumption
| |
CO2 Emissions* |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
1,430,226 |
|
1,504,457 |
|
1,667,846 |
|
1,668,806 |
|
1,630,536 |
|
| |
Kloof |
1,414,382 |
|
1,527,282 |
|
1,590,582 |
|
1,644,755 |
|
1,539,977 |
|
| |
Beatrix** |
759,494 |
|
798,207 |
|
820,304 |
|
811,311 |
|
831,701 |
|
| |
South Deep |
449,659 |
|
473,419 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
194,308 |
|
192,340 |
|
155,525 |
|
130,665 |
|
110,594 |
|
| |
Damang |
54,361 |
|
78,492 |
|
96,212 |
|
55,988 |
|
39,240 |
|
| |
St Ives |
256,598 |
|
240,472 |
|
224,364 |
|
207,591 |
|
187,754 |
|
| |
Agnew |
56,463 |
|
58,166 |
|
71,405 |
|
67,913 |
|
59,401 |
|
The South African operations’ reporting methodology has been aligned with international best practice.
**Thecoal usage at Beatrix was 15,087 tons compared to 16,572 tons in F2008 and has been included in the CO2calculations above.
| |
Electricity (MWh) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
1,641,441 |
|
1,727,046 |
|
1,904,075 |
|
1,910,100 |
|
1,874,000 |
|
| |
Kloof |
1,623,314 |
|
1,751,495 |
|
1,833,957 |
|
1,887,032 |
|
1,766,000 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
848,034 |
|
889,657 |
|
863,460 |
|
931,533 |
|
953,000 |
|
| |
South Deep |
511,355 |
|
540,583* |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
250,270 |
|
214,306 |
|
200,282 |
|
202,641 |
|
163,000 |
|
| |
Damang |
105,206 |
|
89,628 |
|
87,606 |
|
107,006 |
|
108,000 |
|
| |
St Ives |
188,899 |
|
191,369 |
|
192,248 |
|
187,037 |
|
148,000 |
|
| |
Agnew |
52,604 |
|
54,379 |
|
51,472 |
|
48,121 |
|
46,000 |
|
* South Deep’s electricity consumption for F2008 has been adjusted to reflect the alignment of South Deep’s reporting standard with the Group’s reporting standard
| |
Electricity (TJ) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
5,909 |
|
6,217 |
|
6,854 |
|
6,876 |
|
6,740 |
|
| |
Kloof |
5,844 |
|
6,305 |
|
6,602 |
|
6,793 |
|
6,360 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
3,063 |
|
3,202 |
|
3,108 |
|
3,353 |
|
3,430 |
|
| |
South Deep |
1,863 |
|
2,345 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
901 |
|
766 |
|
721 |
|
729 |
|
590 |
|
| |
Damang |
379 |
|
317 |
|
315 |
|
385 |
|
380 |
|
| |
St Ives |
680 |
|
688 |
|
696 |
|
672 |
|
530 |
|
| |
Agnew |
189 |
|
196 |
|
185 |
|
173 |
|
160 |
|
| |
Diesel (TJ) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
87 |
|
86 |
|
85 |
|
160 |
|
66 |
|
| |
Kloof |
88 |
|
109 |
|
90 |
|
110 |
|
113 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
50 |
|
58 |
|
58 |
|
44 |
|
66 |
|
| |
South Deep |
82 |
|
61 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
2,319 |
|
2,331 |
|
1,855 |
|
1,519 |
|
1,300 |
|
| |
Damang |
582 |
|
913 |
|
1,166 |
|
583 |
|
370 |
|
| |
St Ives |
1,297 |
|
1,043 |
|
811 |
|
654 |
|
825 |
|
| |
Agnew |
159 |
|
152 |
|
367 |
|
361 |
|
271 |
|
| |
Petrol (TJ) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
6.2 |
|
8 |
|
10.65 |
|
9.42 |
|
10.2 |
|
| |
Kloof |
4.9 |
|
7 |
|
5.35 |
|
5.45 |
|
4.8 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
4.8 |
|
5 |
|
5.82 |
|
5.43 |
|
7.3 |
|
| |
South Deep |
2.5 |
|
2.5 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
1 |
|
1 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
| |
Damang |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
| |
St Ives |
5.8 |
|
5.4 |
|
3.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
3.6 |
|
| |
Agnew |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.25 |
|
0.35 |
|
0.3 |
|
| |
Liquid Petroleum Gas (TJ) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
6.0 |
|
3.7 |
|
5.85 |
|
4.2 |
|
3.87 |
|
| |
Kloof |
2.3 |
|
3.1 |
|
3.0 |
|
3.2 |
|
2.4 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
| |
South Deep |
0.9 |
|
– |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
4.0 |
|
4.7 |
|
3.8 |
|
6.1 |
|
5.1 |
|
| |
Damang |
76.5 |
|
89.7 |
|
57 |
|
80.3 |
|
112 |
|
| |
St Ives |
16.3 |
|
40 |
|
33 |
|
39.1 |
|
37.6 |
|
| |
Agnew |
12.2 |
|
19.4 |
|
21.6 |
|
21.7 |
|
15.5 |
|
 |
| Near mine exploration aims to increase the life of an operation and adheres to strict environmental protocol |
Land management and biodiversity
The South African operations are represented
on the South African Mining and Biodiversity
Forum (SAMBF). The SAMBF was established
in 2005 to provide a platform for cross-sectoral
interaction and co-operation in order to improve
biodiversity conservation and management in
the mining sector. A review status report on
biodiversity management that was recently
published, identified the need for a guideline
document specific to the South African
mining sector. The SAMBF hascompiled
draft guidelines incorporating local biodiversity
information and best practices specific to
South Africa. During the year the operations
have focused on biodiversity assessments
around sensitive areas which included caves
and sinkholes.
In our last annual report we provided an
overview of the Leadership for conservation
in Africa (LCA). The initiative, of which Gold
Fields was the founding sponsor, seeks to
pursue socio-economic development through conservation on the African continent. Ghana
is very active within the LCA and considering
our footprint in the country, we are actively
supporting conservation bodies within the country. In partnership with the Ghanaian
government, we are leading a potential project
on the Cape coast of Ghana that will contribute
to the conservation of biodiversity and socio-economic
benefits to local communities.
As mentioned previously, in accordance with
our environmental framework, we are in the
process of developing a biodiversity practice
guide that aims to provide the operations
with practical guidance with regard to the
management of biodiversity. This practice guide
has been drafted and is currently subject to
internal review.
Closure
As per our requirements in the closure practice guide, we have again reviewed our closure costs for all Regions. These costs are reflected in the table below:
| Closure provision |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
| Driefontein |
R604 million |
|
R514 million |
|
| Kloof |
R458 million |
|
R391 million |
|
| Beatrix |
R276 million |
|
R226 million |
|
| South Deep |
R171 million |
|
R155 million |
|
| Tarkwa |
US$40 million |
|
US$30 million |
|
| Damang |
US$6 million |
|
US$5 million |
|
| St Ives |
A$74 million |
|
A$73 million |
|
| Agnew |
A$18 million |
|
A$18 million |
|
| Cerro Corona |
US$36 million |
|
US$34 million |
|
These costs are before accounting adjustments, which include compounding and discounting the above amounts
at appropriate rates. As at 30 June 2009, the accounting value was R2,267.9 million.
Waste management
Waste management remains an area of focus
in our environmental management systems. We
have protocols in place to ensure that waste
is dealt with effectively and responsibly and
that recycling opportunities are realised and
maximised. Our environmental management
systems require that any employee that may
impact on the environment by virtue of their
activities, undergo the necessary training. Our
systems utilise two forms of training, these
being awareness and competence training.
The requirement for awareness training is
satisfied through our induction programmes
where employees returning from annual leave,
new employees, and contractors, are exposed
to varying levels of environmental training.
Competency training is more specific and
requires detailed training for specific tasks.
Records are kept of all environmental training.
Relevant employees are required to undergo
training as to the requirements of the waste
protocols to ensure that all waste is handled
responsibly and disposed of in accordance
with procedural arrangements. Such protocols
typically include potentially hazardous waste,
domestic waste and recyclable waste.
TThe greatest stream of waste from our
operations is tailings material. Intensive
systems have been implemented for tailings
management and have been integrated into
the environmental management systems
and therefore tailings facilities are covered by
our ISO14001 certifications and procedural
arrangements where applicable, with the prime
intent of managing any associated potential
impacts. Furthermore, our tailings facilities
are governed under our commitment to the
Cyanide Code and as such are integrated
into our environmental management systems.
Generally, tailings management can be broken
down into three areas. These are:
- Tailings delivery – procedures are in place to
ensure daily inspection of all tailings delivery
infrastructure to ensure that any failures are
detected immediately and rectified before any
significant environmental impact can occur. Associated with this is the necessary spillage
infrastructure. Under the requirements of
the Cyanide Code, further fortifi cations have
been made to all our installations;
- Tailings impoundment – here the issues
of primary concern are tailings stability,
dust management and water containment.
A host of actions are deployed to manage
these impacts, including the concurrent
rehabilitation of tailings facilities to alleviate
any potential impacts associated with
aesthetics or dust, extensive monitoring
networks that are reviewed externally by
professional engineers to ensure the integrity
of the structures, the use of numerous
types of drainage facilities to contain water
on site, extensive monitoring systems
to ensure adherence to Cyanide Code
requirements, committees established to
oversee and monitor management of the
sites, geohydrological studies to determine
whether any potential for contamination
exists and regular reporting to the Safety,
Health and Sustainable Development
Committee on the status of the management
of the facilities; and
- Water return – our tailings structures are
equipped with return water facilities to ensure that
water on the structures is contained in a closed
circuit and returned to the gold processing plants
for re-use. Return water facilities conform to best
practice and Cyanide Code requirements and
also provide buffering capacity for large rainfall
events. Pipelines conveying return water to the
processing facilities are inspected regularly and
also have the necessary spillage containment
structures. Water balances are utilised to
manage the process.
Governing all of the above are the necessary
procedures required in terms of our ISO14001
certification.
At Cerro Corona, we have implemented an
advisory committee consisting of external
experts to review all aspects of tailings
dam construction and management. This
committee was created to ensure best practice
and to provide insight into leading practice from
around the globe. Activities that are reviewed
by this advisory committee range from
construction to tailings placement to water
quality and quantity.
Waste management:
| |
Tailings to dams (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
3,474,719 |
|
3,839,620 |
|
9,779,083 |
|
6,592,996 |
|
6,534,000 |
|
| |
Kloof |
2,753,429 |
|
3,485,680 |
|
3,710,101 |
|
3,681,623 |
|
5,128,000 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
2,991,200 |
|
3,212,600 |
|
3,590,000 |
|
3,540,324 |
|
4,118,000 |
|
| |
South Deep |
1,398,005 |
|
5,212,090 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
5,006,738 |
|
4,979,019 |
|
5,230,888 |
|
4,686,966 |
|
3,190,000 |
|
| |
Damang |
4,083,312 |
|
3,695,229 |
|
5,269,310 |
|
5,327,955 |
|
5,215,000 |
|
| |
St Ives |
4,821,330 |
|
4,647,818 |
|
4,669,446 |
|
4,567,611 |
|
3,753,000 |
|
| |
Agnew |
2,849,747 |
|
2,851,660 |
|
3,226,978 |
|
3,161,159 |
|
1,170,000 |
|
| |
Waste rock to rock dumps (tons) |
F2009 |
|
F2008 |
|
F2007 |
|
F2006 |
|
F2005 |
|
| |
Driefontein |
264,568 |
|
464,996 |
|
559,946 |
|
319,783 |
|
385,000 |
|
| |
Kloof |
921,604 |
|
1,101,623 |
|
1,120,821 |
|
473,371 |
|
625,000 |
|
| |
Beatrix |
597,714 |
|
1,091,543 |
|
934,439 |
|
731,738 |
|
722,000 |
|
| |
South Deep |
0 |
|
105,447 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
| |
Tarkwa |
56,119,157 |
|
89,096,834 |
|
82,168,348 |
|
74,353,234 |
|
61,666,000 |
|
| |
Damang |
15,057,505 |
|
29,433,351 |
|
28,109,727 |
|
21,427,370 |
|
9,050,000 |
|
| |
St Ives |
9,075,024 |
|
12,323,842 |
|
5,210,789 |
|
17,028,304 |
|
20,360,000 |
|
| |
Agnew |
153,416 |
|
425,609 |
|
18,234,119 |
|
14,254,210 |
|
2,060,000 |
|
Cerro Corona not included as it has not operated for a full 12 month period.
Cyanide management
Gold Fields remains committed to the
International Cyanide Management Code.
Beatrix and South Deep have been certified with full compliance, while Driefontein and Kloof are
substantially compliant. Plans are also in place to
upgrade Driefontein and Kloof.
Tarkwa and Damang have been certified with
full compliance to the code and this has been
maintained. In accordance with the audit
protocol, St Ives and Agnew have progressed
initiatives to upgrade their certification from
substantially compliant to full compliance and
are preparing for an audit on their commitments
in the coming financial year.
The Tarkwa closure provision has increased due
to a higher footprint through the construction
of the CIL plant, increase in the heap leach
footprint, increase in tailings storage footprint
and an increase due to pit shell design
associated with a higher price, which increases
the amount of pit and waste rock rehabilitation.
The Damang provision has increased due to
the commencement of mining at the Rex pit.
The St Ives provision has increased as a result
of inflation, but there is a relative decrease as
a result of concurrent rehabilitation that was
undertaken during the year. The Cerro Corona
provision also increased in line with inflation as
the design criteria have not changed nor has
the footprint of the mine.
| |
Region |
Operation |
Certification status |
|
| |
South Africa |
Driefontein |
Substantial compliance 8 April 2009 |
|
| |
|
Kloof |
Substantial compliance 30 July 2009 |
|
| |
|
Beatrix |
Full compliance 21 July 2009 |
|
| |
|
South Deep |
Full compliance 1 April 2009 |
|
| |
West Africa |
Tarkwa |
Full compliance 4 June 2008 |
|
| |
|
Damang |
Full compliance 8 May 2008 |
|
| |
Australia |
St Ives |
Full compliance 5 August 2009 |
|
| |
|
Agnew |
Substantial compliance 3 June 2009, |
|
| |
|
|
full compliance expected by end |
|
| |
|
|
September 2009 |
|
| |
Suppliers |
|
|
|
| |
Ghana |
Orica and Barbex Technical
Services Limited |
16 November 2007 |
|
| |
Australia |
Australian Gold Reagents
Pty Limited |
Certified 9 October 2007 |
|
| |
South Africa |
Sasol |
8 March 2007 |
|
Fines and legal actions
During F2009, no significant fines or non-compliance
actions were levelled against the
company.
|