SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Independent Assurance Statement
To the Board and stakeholders
of Gold Fields:
SustainabilityServices.co.za (SS) was
commissioned by Gold Fields to provide
independent third party assurance over this
2009 Sustainability Report (the ‘Report’,
covering the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June
2009). The assurance team comprised
of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
consultants with experience in environmental
and social performance measurement over a
period of more than 10 years.
AccountAbility AA1000S (revised, 2008)
To the best of our ability, this assurance
engagement has been managed in accordance
with AccountAbility’s AA1000AS (2008)
assurance standard, and structured to meet
the AA1000AS Type 1 (Moderate) requirements.
Independence
SS was not responsible for the preparation of
any part of this Report and has not undertaken
any commissions for Gold Fields in the
reporting period concerning reporting or data
collection.
Assurance objectives
Our assurance objectives were to provide
stakeholders with an independent ‘moderate
level assurance’ opinion on whether the report
meets the AA1000AS (2008) principles of
Inclusivity, Materiality and Responsiveness, as
well as to assess the degree to which the Report
is consistent with the 10 International Council
on Metal and Mining (ICMM) Sustainable
Development (SD) principles and the Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI) G3 guidelines, to the
extent of meeting the GRI’s B+ level of reporting
application.
Scope of work performed
AA1000AS (2008) Compliance
The process used in arriving at this assurance
statement is based on AccountAbility’s
AA1000AS (2008) guidance, other best
practices in sustainability reporting assurance.
Our approach to assurance included:
- A review of Gold Fields’ measurement and
reporting procedures;
- A review of drafts of the Report for any
significant anomalies; and,
- Interviews with the individual responsible
for collating and writing various parts of the
Report in order to ensure selected claims
were reported and substantiated.
Unlike other assurance engagements, site
visits were not undertaken to test accuracy of
data at the primary source of collection and
collation.

Given that this is a Type 1 (Moderate) assurance
engagement, the testing of data accuracy was
limited to trend and anomaly studies.
Alignment to the ICMM 10 SD Principles
Our objective was to provide assurance over
the alignment of the company’s sustainability
policies to the ICMM’s 10 SD principles and
any mandatory requirements set out in ICMM
position statements.
The process employed included a
comprehensive desk review of the Report,
interviews with relevant company officials
regarding the status of implementation of
systems, and selective testing of the functionality
of key systems and procedures.
GRI compliance
In determining the GRI G3 ‘Application Level’ of
the Report, we performed the following:
- A review of processes employed to define
content, context and materiality, as well as
stakeholder engagement processes, and
the inclusion of reasonable discourses over
material issues;
- A review of the approach of management to
addressing topics discussed in the Report;
and
- A review of drafts of the Report to assess GRI
G3 performance indicators covered in the
Report.
Findings
AA1000AS (2008) – Inclusivity, Materiality and
Responsiveness
In general, the company’s sustainability
reporting processes are adequate. However, it
was found that:
- Although Gold Fields actively engages an array of key stakeholders, as defined within this Report, the assurance process did not
allow for additional engagement to confirm
or refute Gold Fields’ assertion that the
Report adequately reflects the information
requirements of their key stakeholders;
- Within the scope of a ‘Moderate Level Type 1
assurance assessment’, the Report appears
to reflect an accurate accounting of Gold
Fields’ sustainability reporting performance.
- The Report does not clearly afford
stakeholders an understanding of Gold Fields’
most material sustainability issues.
Alignment to the 10 ICMM SD Principles
Based on the work done, we can confirm
that the company’s Sustainable Development
Framework is aligned with the 10 ICMM
SD Principles, and that these principles
have informed the structure and content of
this Report and the implementation of its
policies and systems which drive company
performance.
GRI compliance
Based on our review of the Report, as well
as the processes employed to collect and
collate information reported herein, it is our
assertion that this Report meets the GRI G3’s
requirements for Application Level B (responses
to all required indicators, as well as no fewer
than 20 Core indicators, with at least one
from each of Economic, Environment, Human
Rights, Labour and Society). However, it was
found that:
Product Responsibility indicators were
reasonably deemed ‘not applicable’, and thus
were not reported.
The reporting of performance against some
GRI G3 indicators requires either data quality
improvements, or further detail in disclosure.
Recommendations
AA1000AS (2008)
- Gold Fields should ensure that stakeholder
engagement procedures include an
assessment of whether or not Sustainability
Reports adequately reflect the reporting
requirements of key stakeholders;
- Gold Fields should improve its reporting
in line with the principles of Inclusiveness,
Materiality, and Responsiveness, as guided
by AA1000AS (2008), seeking Type 2 (High)
levels of assurance in future.
- Future sustainability reports should
be designed and developed to afford
stakeholders a clearer understanding of Gold
Fields’ most material sustainability issues.
Alignment to the 10 ICMM SD Principles
Based on our findings, Gold Fields should
demonstrate that this and future Reports
adequately address the concerns and
information requirements of its key stakeholders,
and that these concerns are shown to play a
role in informing materiality of the company’s
SD risk management process as well as its
reporting.
GRI compliance
Having reasonably met GRI G3 Application Level
B basic requirements, it is our recommendation
that Gold Fields continue to review the process
followed in compiling the Report and ensure
that further reporting improvements occur
to enhance the quality of data required for
Application Level B
Conclusions
Based on the information reviewed,
www.SustainabilityServices.co.za is confident that
this report provides a reasonably complete and
balanced account of the environmental, safety
and social performance of Gold Fields during
the period under review. The data presented
is based on systematic processes and we
are satisfied that the reported performance
data adequately represents the sustainability
performance of Gold Fields, while meeting
the AA1000AS (2008) principles of inclusivity,
materiality and responsiveness. The Report is
consistent with the 10 ICMM SD principles.
Moreover, and although the quality or quantity
of data of some GRI G3 indicators can be
improved, this Report appears to meet the GRI
G3’s requirements for Application Level B (B+
with this assurance engagement).
SustainabilityServices.co.za
10 September 2009

|