Our materiality analysis identifies the significant economic and ESG factors that could substantively influence our capital providers‚ and other stakeholders‚ decisions about Gold Fields‚ ability to deliver on its strategic objectives and create value over the short, medium and long term. This informs the Group‚s business plans and strategies, as well as our sustainability reporting approach.
We review and update our GRI-aligned materiality analysis annually, which informs and is informed by:
We concluded a three-year materiality analysis cycle in 2021 and planned to initiate a new 2022-and-beyond cycle this year. This was suspended when we announced our intention to acquire Yamana Gold, a transaction we ultimately terminated. Instead, we extended our existing cycle by a year and reviewed and updated our materiality analysis and related material topics for 2022. We, therefore, did not undertake a materialityrelated stakeholder engagement process in 2022.
Our 2022 materiality analysis involved:To support our revised materiality analysis and disclosure, we started revising our public disclosures on the management of material issues, supported by our suite of sustainability reporting. Given the changes to the sustainability reporting landscape – as well as emerging or proposed ESG-related reporting standards, guidelines and frameworks – we will include an inclusive, double-materiality analysis in our next assessment cycle. This means we will not only report the impact our
operations have on stakeholders, but also their impact on Gold Fields and its operations.
We categorise our material matters as environmental, social or economic and governance matters for this materiality analysis cycle. While our 2022 material matters have not changed significantly, some have become increasingly important or been updated to reflect our evolving management approach:
The graphic below outlines our materiality analysis as at end-2022.