Independent reasonable assurance statement to Gold Fields Limited

ERM Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd ("ERM") was engaged by Gold Fields Limited ("Gold Fields") to provide reasonable assurance in relation to selected information set out below and presented in Gold Fields' 2022 Integrated Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2022 (the "Report").

Engagement summary
Scope of our assurance engagement Whether Gold Fields' assertions relating to the following ICMM Subject Matters (SM) are fairly presented in the Report, in all material respects, in accordance with the reporting criteria:
  • SM1: The alignment of Gold Fields' sustainability policies, management standards and procedures
    to the ICMM Principles, any mandatory requirements set out in ICMM Position Statements, the corporate-level ICMM Performance Expectations (PEs) and corporate-level aspects of the combined PEs.
  • SM2: Gold Fields' material sustainability risks and opportunities based on its own review of the business and the views and expectations of its stakeholders.
  • SM3: The existence of systems and approaches that Gold Fields is using to manage selected material sustainability risks and opportunities.
  • SM4: Gold Fields' reported performance during the given reporting period for selected material sustainability risks and opportunities, as listed in Tables 1 and 2 overleaf.
    • SM5: Disclosures regarding Gold Fields' prioritisation process for selecting assets for third-party PE Validation.
Our assurance engagement does not extend to information in respect of earlier periods or to any other information included in the Report.
Reporting period 2022 (1 January 2022 – 31 December 2022)
Reporting criteria
  • ICMM Assurance and Validation Procedure (March 2023), including the ICMM Principles, ICMM Position Statements and ICMM Performance Expectations
  • The GRI Reporting Standards of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), including the GRI's Mining and Metals Sector Supplement (2013)
  • Gold Fields' definitions for the selected environmental, social, health, safety and South African Mining Charter indicators as disclosed within the Report and on Gold Fields' website
Assurance standard and level of assurance We performed a reasonable assurance engagement, in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements ISAE 3000 (Revised) 'Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information' and in accordance with ISAE 3410 for Greenhouse Gas data issued by the International Auditing and Standards Board.
Respective responsibilities Gold Fields is responsible for preparing the Report, including the collection and presentation of the disclosures covered by the scope of our engagement, the design, implementation and maintenance of related internal controls over the information and data, as well as the integrity of its website. ERM's responsibility is to provide an opinion on the selected information based on the evidence we have obtained and exercising our professional judgement, on whether the information covered by the scope of our engagement has been prepared in accordance with the stated criteria. ERM disclaims any liability for any decision a person or entity may make based on this Assurance Statement.

OUR OPINION

In our opinion, the selected information as described under 'scope' above is fairly presented, in all material respects, in accordance with the reporting criteria.

EMPHASIS OF MATTER

Without affecting our opinion, we draw attention to the explanatory notes provided by Gold Fields in Energy and carbon management of the Report relating to the total emissions avoided for the group, which includes projects at Tarkwa and Damang mines that are recognised as exceptional continuous projects by the Gold Fields Group Head of Energy and Carbon.

OUR ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

Considering the level of assurance and our assessment of the risk of material misstatement of the selected information presented in the Report, a multi-disciplinary team of sustainability and assurance specialists performed a range of procedures that included, but was not restricted to, the following:

  • Assessing the appropriateness of the reporting criteria for the selected information presented in the Report.
  • A review of external media reporting relating to Gold Fields to identify sustainability issues in the reporting period that may be relevant to the assurance scope.
  • Interviews with a selection of staff and management, including senior executives, to gain an understanding of:
    • Gold Fields' sustainability strategy, policies and management systems, including stakeholder engagement and materiality assessment;
    • The status of implementation of the ICMM Mining Principles (including the corporate-level PEs and corporate-level aspects of the combined PEs) and ICMM Position Statements in Gold Fields' strategy and policies;
    • Gold Fields' identification and management of sustainable development risks and opportunities as determined through its review of the business and the views and expectations of its stakeholders; and
    • The relevant management systems and processes (including internal review and control processes) used for collecting and reporting the selected disclosures.
  • Reviewing supporting evidence related to external stakeholder engagement on material issues facing the business.
  • Confirming that Gold Fields' policies and procedures in effect remain aligned with the ICMM Mining Principles (including the PEs) and other mandatory requirements set out in the ICMM Position Statements in effect as at 31 December 2022.
  • Testing the processes and systems, including internal controls, used to generate, consolidate and report the selected information.
  • Interviews with management representatives responsible for managing the selected issues.
  • A review at corporate level of a sample of qualitative and quantitative evidence supporting the reported information.
  • An analytical review of the year-end data submitted by all locations included in the consolidated 2022 group data for the selected disclosures which included testing the completeness and mathematical accuracy of conversions and calculations, and consolidation in line with the stated reporting boundary.
  • In-person visits to the following sites to review source data and local reporting systems and controls:
    • Gruyere Mine, Australia;
    • St Ives Mine, Australia;
    • South Deep Mine, South Africa;
    • Tarkwa Mine, West Africa; and
    • Damang Mine, West Africa.
  • Virtual visits to the following sites to review source data and local reporting systems and controls:
    • Agnew Mine, Australia;
    • Granny Smith Mine, Australia; and
    • Cerro Corona Mine, Peru.
  • Confirming conversion and emission factors and assumptions used.
  • Reviewing the presentation of information relevant to the scope of our work in the Report to ensure consistency with our findings.

THE LIMITATIONS OF OUR ENGAGEMENT

The reliability of the assured information is subject to inherent uncertainties, given the available methods for determining, calculating or estimating the underlying information. It is important to understand our assurance opinions in this context.

FORCE MAJEURE

As a result of safety concerns arising from the socio-political unrest in Peru at the time of the planned site visit, we were unable to carry out certain assurance activities as originally planned and agreed with Gold Fields. The in-person visit to Gold Fields' Cerro Corona mine was replaced with remote reviews via teleconference and video calls for this year's assurance engagement. While we believe these changes do not affect our reasonable assurance opinions above, we draw attention to the possibility that if we had undertaken an in-person visit we may have identified errors and omissions in the assured information that we did not discover through the alternative approach.

UR INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY AND QUALITY CONTROL

ERM Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd and ERM Certification and Verification Services Limited ("ERM CVS") are members of the ERM Group. All employees are subject to ERM's Global Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. ERM CVS is an independent certification and verification body accredited by UKAS to ISO 17021:2015. Accordingly, ERM CVS maintain a comprehensive system of quality control, including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Our quality management system is at least as demanding as the relevant sections of ISQM-1 and ISQM-2 (2022).

ERM CVS applies a Code of Conduct and related policies to ensure that its employees maintain integrity, objectivity, professional competence and high ethical standards in their work. ERM CVS' processes are designed and implemented to ensure that the work we undertake is objective, impartial and free from bias and conflict of interest. ERM CVS' certified management system covers independence and ethical requirements that are at least as demanding as the relevant sections of Parts A & B of the IESBA Code relating to assurance engagements.

The team that has undertaken this assurance engagement has extensive experience in conducting assurance on environmental, social, ethical and health and safety information, systems and processes, and provides no consultancy related services to Gold Fields Limited in any respect.

Jonathan van Gool

Engagement Partner
ERM Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
Johannesburg, South Africa

Gareth Manning

Review Partner
ERM Certification and Verification Services Limited
London, United Kingdom

30 March 2023

www.erm.com | ERM.SouthAfricaAdminMailbox@erm.com